“I told Congress: ‘Thanks but no thanks for that Bridge to Nowhere up in Alaska,’ ” Palin told the crowds at the “McCain Street USA” rallies. “If we wanted a bridge, we’ll build it ourselves.”
Palin’s position on the bridge that would have linked Ketchikan to Gravina Island is one example of a candidate staying on message even when that message has been publicly discredited. Palin has continued to say she opposed a project she once campaigned for — then killed later, only after support for it had collapsed in Congress. ”
This interesting reporting is from The Washington Post. The Post says she continues to continue saying this “even when that message has been publicly discredited.” OK, when does this become “lying”. And, when will the Post and others in the media start calling it what it is L-Y-I-N-G?
There is also an “inconsistency” in her stated position on “Earmarking”. When is that gonna be called what it is. We could go on and on. But, do we need to? The Washington Post and others know the half-truths and outright lies that they let slide in their reporting. Is this on purpose, or are they really that “unknowing”?
Are they purposefully stacking the deck against Barack Obama. Are they using a double standard for “the Black guy”, as related to perky little cute lady and her elder friend? We’d like to know…
Look, we know the “silly season” has already started. And, we know the deck is stacked against the Black guy. We just want to let you know we know. And, we want to remind fair minded folk that they need to be letting you know they know, too. And, we want them to show up at the polling place to let ya’ll know they have not been fooled.
The struggle continues, until we succeed-and we shall!!!