Q: What is the Clinton Brand? - A: Depends on what polls well… ~ Editorial


For the Democrats, the worst thing that has happened since January is the tarnishing of the Clinton brand. Clinton haters: Don’t laugh. The truth is that when this whole thing began, the vast majority of Democrats — including Obama supporters — and a fair number of independents had largely positive views of Bill Clinton’s record and Hillary Clinton’s merits.

This is obviously a problem for Hillary Clinton herself, but it is also very bad for a Democratic Party that cannot afford to see the entire Clinton legacy discredited.

What do you think?

From the Desk of the Editor | 8-PAC

2 Responses to “Q: What is the Clinton Brand? - A: Depends on what polls well… ~ Editorial”

  1. I’m thinking that the Clinton legacy is already shaky, to say the least. Go back past Whitewater, and Monica Lewinsky. Go back to the 70s when Hillary worked for that San Francisco law firm that defended Bobby Seale and The Panthers in that murder case.

    There are a lot of gaps in between then and The Monica Lewinsky thing. Before we start creating legacies and stuff, let’s fill in some gaps. Jennifer Flowers, and several other bimbos must be included in there, of course.

    If we’re gonna be authentic, we must be complete.

  2. Sorry you haven’t gotten more comments. But, let me add another, that’s indicative of how fast the “Clinton legacy” is fading.

    Since the last memo (just 4 days ago) we’ve gotten the correct spelling of Gennifer (with a “G”), and we’ve witnessed Hillary trying to scuttle the “black guy’s” chance at winning the White House.

    That piece by her, the USA Today interview, what a level to slink by one of the top Brand Names in politics. Hardly anyone can believe the pandering by her to “White hard-working Americans”.

    We are still in “shock” as to the real motives behind that. Normally we could chalk it up to ignorance and racism. But, c.mon, we’re talking about THE CLINTONS…

Leave a Reply